sure, duration form....
a little clarification: i wanted to say "now - in the present - etc etc"
i believed your phrase was used to speak about a a different time (yesterday, two days ago etc); When may we say "i had been working..."???
sorry, just a great confusion!!:muro::storto:
The duration form is right for your sentence
I'm sorry, 'cause I can't explain the rules to you, now. It's too difficult using the English language :storto:
I'll try, but I can't assure you that it will be a good idea, I tell you
I've been working since eight o'clock in the morning (lavoro/sto lavorando dalle otto di "stamattina").
This is the "duration form", indicating an action which began in the past, but still lasts at the present.
In plain words, it means "beginning and continuity" (or continuation, as you prefer).
Anyhow, a period of time leading up to the present, that is...we are thinking of the action going on
k07:
It simply means:
1) that I began to work at eight o'clock in the morning
2) that I still work while I'm talking
N.B. You must pay attention to the negative form of a sentence that needs the use of the "duration form",
'cause a lot of people usually make a big mistake!
EX: I've been working for two hours (lavoro da due ore)
BUT: I've
not worked for two hours (!) (Can you see the difference?
k07
P.S. I
link this simple and clear explanation of the "duration form".
I hope it will be useful. Bye! :flower:
☟
P.S.2 Sorry, I was forgetting your first question :ros:
Ex: 1) I
had been playing tennis for hours, when my mother called me for lunch (I hope it's right ahahah!!!)
Ex: 2) I found the calculator. I
had been looking for it for ages
.........(Ho trovato la calcolatrice. La cercavo/stavo cercando da secoli)