Hello guys, I need your help: I tried to make a review of the book "Mody Dick", for school. I would like you to have a look and tell me if there's some grammar mistakes or best structures.
The plot of the book can be summarized very briefly as the voyage of a whaling ship, the Pequod, commanded by Captain Ahab, chasing whales and sperm whales, and in particular the huge white whale (actually a sperm whale), which gives the title to the novel.. However, Moby Dick is much more
than this: the whaling scenes are interspersed
with reflections scientific, religious, philosophical and artistic character of Ishmael [I don't understand this line... 'reflections' should be after the following adjectives, but then there you wrote 'character', so perhaps you meant 'with reflections of the scientific, etc, artistic character..', or it was instead 'with scientific, etc, artistic reflections of the character..'? If you thought this sentence in Italian, in case write your original one and we'll work from there], “alter ego” of the writer,
making the journey allegory and epic [same here, it's not clear to me what you mean.. perhaps: 'making an allegoric and epic journey', or 'making the journey an allegory and epic (tale)'? Again, if you thought of it in Italian we can work from the sentence you had in mind]. Ishmael, the protagonist, soon learns that Ahab has one (
and only) purpose on this voyage:
to seek seeking out Moby Dick, a ferocious, enigmatic white sperm whale. In a previous encounter, the whale destroyed Ahab's boat and bit off his leg, which now drives Ahab to take revenge (
on it).
Ishmael is the narrator. At the beginning
he is actually the main character, but he is primarily an omniscient narrator, who
-with his issues and his depth
- sometimes disappears from the scene to tell and then enter his thoughts.
I enjoyed this book mainly for the
deep depth of some philosophical thoughts
[here I'd add something, eg: some philosophical thoughts it offers].
Perhaps this is the educational value of the book, in stimulating the imagination, and a more careful reading to reflect on questions,
if we want philosophy which has always been the man instead [this sentence it's confusing to me.. again, did you write it thinking of an Italian one?].